Perkasie needs a Smart Council, not Smart Meters

A proposal for adding an electric "smart meter" system came up at budget time as a "wishlist" item from the electric department- despite a call to cut budgets by 1-3%.  The number associated with this expense has been cited at $550,000 which seems dubious after the presentation by Elster and GE given at a special electric utility committee meeting held Monday, August 25th. with little notice to the public.  In fact it didn't appear as a notice on the borough website or social media outlets until earlier that day. Link to audio recording of meeting. 

"Smart meters" are cutting edge technology that manufacturers claim will make your electric service more reliable, allow users to track their usage in "real time", reduce costs, and make electric transmission more efficient while making utility workers jobs safer.  They would replace the traditional electric meter usually mounted on the side of your home and act as 2-way radio frequency (RF) mesh network devices that communicate with the utility server as frequently as every minute.  The term "mesh network" refers to the ability for a smart meter located at your home to pass along not only your information but to act as a relay point for other homes as well.  Meaning that RF traffic could potentially occur all the time!

In reality what they do is intrude on the privacy of your home, with the capability to track what appliances you are using, when you are home, and the ability to interact with other RF capable devices in your home allowing a utility to control your usage. A 2012 Congressional Report Service report on smart meters raises serious security and 4th Amendment privacy issues.  Some models of these meters have caused fires. At the meeting a resident reported that a friend had opted in to a program in MD and found that his air conditioning was cut back on one of the hottest days of the summer of 2013.

These meters also cost more for residents (estimated at an additional $30 per meter) and have a lifespan of only 7-10 years as compared with traditional meters at 40-50 years.  Assuming it doesn't catch on fire first, because neither of the meters from the 2 companies that presented to the committee are UL-listed for safety.
So why Perkasie?  With one of the most reliable electric utilities in the county if not the state, what other possible reason could there be for spending more money that residents don't have on this type of program? During the 1 hour+ long presentation Perkasie electric superintendent Harold Stone testified that the line loss (electricity lost due to resistance and equipment not operating at peak efficiency) for Perkasie should be around 4% but is about 5%, inferring that a smart meter system could help them find issues and improve this- but a minute later he explained that the threshold of 10% loss is when you really start looking for problems. He also made the dubious claim that due to currently malfunctioning meters the Borough was losing $100,000 of revenue per year.

Do Perkasie residents really want to be able to track their usage in real-time and give the borough the ability to monitor their usage and more easily shut off their service?  What about the privacy and security concerns? Could smart meters be used as a tool for political retribution? Perhaps what residents really want is their electric rates to return to normal after the 2008 bungled contract that was negotiated under the watch of then Utility Chair Jim Purcell- interestingly the same individual who still holds that position.

Did Perkasie officials consult with neighboring Lansdale about their experience with these smart meters?  In the words of Lansdale councilman:

"Obviously, it's a big expenditure for putting in meters. Did we identify it as an absolute need? Is there a projected life of the meters?" Angelichio said. "In 2006, we spent a boatload of money on new meters. Seven years later, we're spending a lot more on some meters. I want to make sure it's a cost-effective solution."   

The article goes on to claim that employees of the electric company can help residents identify ways to cut their bills.  Is an expensive system really needed for that, or with just a simple device available at most home improvement stores can a homeowner identify appliances that consume more electricity and cut back on their usage?

Will you eventually be forced to have a smart meter installed?  There is pending legislation to allow consumers to "opt-out", make sure to contact your state representatives and let them know how you feel about this before you are forced to adapt this new expensive technology.

Learn more about the potential issues with smart meters here:

http://www.stopsmartmetersnow.com/

http://www.stopsmartmetersinpa.com/

Walnut Street Bridge at "Critical Zero" rating

According to an article published in the Intelligencer on 8/5/14:

Perkasie council revealed Monday night it was urgently seeking the county to repair the Walnut Street Bridge, after Councilman Matt Aigeldinger brought the issue up by saying he had seen the damage to the bridge.

“It’s got a pretty substantial crack that’s opened up on the pedestrian side of the bridge,” Aigeldinger said. “Also, there’s a crack that goes across the road, and three other ones.”

Borough engineer Doug Rossino said the bridge received a 0 out of 100 rating by inspectors in July, triggering a “critical zero” rating and prompting state agencies to send a letter to Bucks County requiring a response within a week about what action it would take.

The county response is required this week, Rossino said. Borough manager Andrea Coaxum added she had sent a letter to the county and spoke to the county’s Director of Operations Gerald Anderson.

“We sent a letter ... about the condition of the bridge and how important it is that we keep the bridge open for emergency services,” Coaxum said.

Council said the bridge is not scheduled to be replaced until 2018, and added that a worst case scenario would shut down the bridge for safety concerns. The Main Street Bridge is also scheduled for replacement in 2018, council members said, adding that a simultaneous closure would have a detrimental effect.

“It would cripple the entire area, not just for emergency services, but businesses and residents in the area,” Coaxum said.

Council Vice President Jim Purcell said he did not believe the repairs would be overly extensive, but that the borough could not fix it without opening itself up to liability.

“It can be fixed fairly easily,” Purcell said. “But we’re not going to touch it because that’s not our responsibility.”

Council members said they had also reached out to local representatives, and urged residents to do the same.

“Residents should please, send an e-mail to their state representative and contact the county commissioners,” said Councilman Justin Stottlar.

Question: if, according to VP Purcell it can be fixed fairly easy- then why hasn't the county started repairs?  Why has the borough waited until it reached a zero rating out of 100 to publicly address this?  Why has the Perkasie Pride majority faction on council failed to address this?  Were they so content being cuddled up with ousted manager Dan Olpere that they failed to see it?  Whose responsibility was it to see that it didn't get this far?

Residents are encouraged to not only call the county and state representatives- but also call President Ryder, VP Purcell, and Perkasie Pride ringleader Matt Aigeldinger and ask them why they failed to address this until now?